Vincent
Hunink
review
of:
Hofmann
H. (ed.), Latin fiction. The Latin Novel in Context, Pp. xi + 277.
London, New York: Routledge, 1999.
£45 hbk. ISBN 0 415 14721 2.
text
published in: Classical Review 51, 2001,
272-3
The ancient novel has become more popular among
scholars than it ever was before. In recent decades numerous editions,
commentaries and translations, both of the preserved integral novels and of
fragments, have been published. Scholarly studies on the genre and its specimina
have become prolific and their range is quite impressive. One only needs to
think of the Groningen Colloquia on the Novel (of which H. was the
founder) and the recent 3rd International Congress on the Ancient Novel
(Groningen, July 2000).
Given the present abundance of publications, handbooks
for students become useful or even necessary. For the Greek novels, we already
possessed Greek fiction. The Greek novel in context, edited by J.R.
Morgan and Richard Stoneman (1994). The present volume is intended as a
companion volume and covers the wide field of the `Latin novel'. The editor, H.
(now professor of Latin at the university of Tübingen) has assembled sixteen
well-written essays, in which some renowned specialists reflect on the current
state of research concerning the Roman novelists.
Petronius' Satyrica and Apuleius' Metamorphoses
are, of course, prominent: there are four contributions on either novel. After a
general introduction by Heinz Hofmann, there is an opening essay on Petronius by
Gareth Schmeling. In a piece on the Cena, John Bodel analyses the rather
complex structure and main themes of this most famous part of the Satyrica.
The various other inserted stories in the novel, such as that of the `widow of
Ephesus', are covered in an essay by Graham Anderson, while Catherine Connors
uses a Medieval work inspired by Petronius, called the Petronius redivivus,
to cast light on the roles of arbitrium (judgement) and poetry in the Satyrica.
The essays on Apuleius show a similar division: a general essay by Gerald Sandy,
a piece on the Greek sources by Hugh J. Mason, one on the central story of Cupid
and Psyche again by Gerald Sandy, while the other inserted tales are dealt with
by Nancy Shumate.
The other essays cover areas that are decidedly less
familiar to most readers. There are rather brief essays on the late Latin Historia
Apollonii regis Tyrae by Gareth Schmeling, and on the Ephemeris belli
Trojani of Dictus Cretensis and the Acta diurna belli Trojani of
Dares Phrygius by Stefan Merkle. These are followed by two longer pieces on `the
Latin Alexander' (from Curtius Rufus to fourth century works) by Richard
Stoneman, and on the entertaining qualities of hagiographic texts by Gerlinde
Huber-Rebenich.
The final part of the book contains a group of four
papers highlighting aspects of the `Nachleben' of Latin fiction. Claudio
Moreschini studies the history of the interpretation of Apuleius' Cupid and
Psyche (dealing with Fulgentius, Boccaccio, and Renaissance writers). The
reception of Historia Regis Apollonii is studied by Elizabeth Archibald.
Richard Stoneman again writes about Alexander, but now `the Medieval Alexander'.
The `rediscovery' of Petronius and Apuleius by the humanists is central in a
concluding piece by Robert H.F. Carver.
As in any collection of essays, the quality and
complexity of contributions differs, although clearly an attempt was made to
produce a well-balanced volume that is useful for students. Scholars approaching
the volume in the hope of finding revolutionary insights or discussions of
literary theory will inevitably be disappointed. Those, however, who wish to
acquaint themselves with the broad field of Latin fiction, will find much in
this book that suits them. Most essays are conveniently short and well
structured and provide readers an easy access to the texts and the main problems
concerning them.
One or two desiderata may perhaps be added here.
In a volume such as this, a separate essay on the earliest Roman texts such as
the Roman version of the Milesian Tales by Sisenna, would have not have
been out of place. After all, Roman fiction does not begin with Petronius. Some
remarks on e.g. Roman satire, narrative poetry, and letter writing (one readily
thinks of some `novellistic' letters by Pliny) could have been added as well.
The special Roman inspiration of Petronius and, particularly, Apuleius, deserves
more attention.
The essay on hagiography is particularly welcome and is
well placed in the volume as a whole. It deservedly highlights texts such as the
apocryphal Acts of the Apostles. But what about the canonical Acts? Or, indeed,
of the whole Bible, a book so full of narrative? (As it is acknowledged on p.
189: `The literary influence of this text simply cannot be overestimated').
Surely, then, a short contribution on the Vetus Latina and Vulgate would seem
required.
Given the introductory nature of most essays, one would
expect clear bibliographical notes referring to the standard editions,
commentaries, and (above all, perhaps) translations, but surprisingly this
practical information is mostly missing. Surely, few users of the book will have
immediate access to texts like Dictys or the Historia Apollonii and some more
suggestions for reading the primary texts would have been helpful.
Finally, most authors are distinguished experts and
there is hardly room for complaint here. Nonetheless, it is rather surprising to
find no scholars from Groningen on the list of contributors, although Groningen
certainly counts as one of the centres of ancient novel studies. One wonders
whether it was really necessary to have three contributors represented in the
volume with two essays each.
But of course, a collection of essays could always have
been better and there is always still work to be done. Latin Fiction is a
convenient and thorough volume that covers a wide field of Latin texts and will
be of use to many students of the ancient novels. Particularly, it will render
good services in university courses.
latest changes
here: 30-07-2012 16:01
|